Counter Interp for Non-Topical Aff’s:

Text: The Affirmative may defend an advocacy that rejects the resolution if they prove the resolution is fascist#### We meet: #### Standards:Anti-fascist politics

• Microfascism: Crystallization of desire allows for microfascism to be coded into the material formations of social organization which then creates fascist civil society and policy. The revolutionary affect of the PMC is uniquely key to dismantle this because it embraces a nomadic relation to subjects and the land which creates horizontal forms of knowledge and relationships which makes crystallization impossible.- Internal Link: Dismantling fascism controls the IL to having good education and fairness because if we continue to allow for microfascism to circuit the way that we understand debate it means that the education that is produced is always necessarily fascistic in nature which is not only problematic but chills new forms of education. Additionally, fascism is always bad for fairness because there will always be those populations that fascism deems as inherently outside of its universal definition of the human and thus specific debaters will always be pushed out.Affect

• Subjectivity: Subjects interaction with structures of power and desire through affect is the fundamental way that subjects form and have their subjectivity formed. This is due to the fact that subjects fundamentally shape and change their conception of their own subjectivity through their connection with other subjects and the constant change in social location/ontology that brings. Structures of power hijack this by purporting a universal concept of desire and then using that to define subject’s subjectivity for them. Aff is the IL to resolve this.- Priori question: Understanding how subjectivity forms is always a prior question to questions of fairness and education because both of those are concerned with the bodies that fill debate, but if we have a lack of understanding of how those bodies function and how they came to be, it means that our forms of education and fairness will always fail in their particularity to address the multitude of different subjects inside debate.#### Voters:Accessibility

• Prior question: Access always comes before fairness and education because we have to be able to have subjects have the possibility of engaging with debate before we can concern questions of the internal nature of the activity.Reasonability > CI

• Definition: Reasonability means if we win one turn or standard on T then that is a reason to vote for us, because it means we are either reasonably topic or the T is reasonably bad.- Weaponization: Prefer reasonability because CI is used as a way to force the affirmative into one static type of argumentation and is used as a way to chill conversations on Affs like ours.